Synthesis and herbicidal activity of acifluorfen analogues
-
摘要: 以2,5-二羟基苯甲酸甲酯和三氟羧草醚为起始原料,设计合成了3个系列20个新的三氟羧草醚类似物,通过核磁共振氢谱、碳谱对其结构进行了表征。分别采用小杯法和室内盆栽法测定了目标化合物的除草活性。结果表明,化合物 III-02 [5-(2-氯-4-三氟甲基苯氧基)-2-硝基苯甲酸-(6-甲基苯并噻唑-2-基)酯]对单子叶杂草的除草活性明显高于对照药剂三氟羧草醚,其对稗草Echinochloa crusgalli和马唐Digitaria sanguinalis根茎生长的EC50值分别为2.03、0.93 μg/mL和1.49、0.52 μg/mL;在有效成分100 g/hm2的施药剂量下,化合物 III-02 对单子叶杂草稗草、马唐及狗尾草Setaria viridis的防治效果均在85%以上,明显高于三氟羧草醚,对阔叶杂草马齿苋Portulaca oleracea、反枝苋Amaranthus retroflexus及苘麻Abutilon theophrasti的防治效果可达100%。初步构效关系表明,2-硝基苯甲酰衍生物的除草活性明显优于其2-甲氧基衍生物,三氟羧草醚苯甲酸酯衍生物对单子叶杂草的除草活性明显高于其苯甲酰胺衍生物。Abstract: Three series of twenty new acifluorfen analogues were designed and synthesized using methyl 2,5-dihydroxybenzoate and acifluorfen as starting materials. Their structures were characterized by 1H NMR and 13C NMR. The herbicidal activities of the compounds were determined by methods of petri dish and greenhouse potted. The results showed that the herbicidal activity of compound III-02 [6-methylbenzo[d]thiazol-2-yl 5-(2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy)-2-nitrobenzoate] against monocotyledonous weeds was significantly higher than that of acifluorfen, and its EC50 values were 2.03, 0.93 μg/mL and 1.49, 0.52 μg/mL against the roots and stems of Echinochloa crusgalli and Digitaria sanguinalis, respectively. Additionally, at the dosage of 100 g a.i./ha, the efficacy of compound III -02 against monocotyledonous weeds E. crusgalli, S. sanguinalis and Setaria viridis was above 85%, which was significantly higher than that of acifluorfen, and a 100% control effect on broadleafs Portulaca oleracea, Amaranthus retroflexus and Abutilon theophrasti. The structure-activity relationship showed that the herbicidal activity of 2-NO2 benzoyl derivatives was significantly higher than that of 2-OCH3 analogues, and the herbicidal activity of acifluorfen benzoate derivatives against monocotyledons was significantly higher than that of benzamide derivatives.
-
Key words:
- acifluorfen /
- analogues /
- synthesis /
- herbicidal activity /
- SAR
-
表 1 目标化合物中取代基R的结构
Table 1. The structural formulas of target compounds
化合物
Compd.R 化合物
Compd.R 化合物
Compd.R 化合物
Compd.R I-01 — I-06 II-05 4-Cl II-10 6-Br I-02 II-01 — II-06 6-Me III-01 H I-03 II-02 H II-07 6-OMe III-02 6-Me I-04 II-03 4-Me II-08 6-OEt III-03 6-Cl I-05 II-04 4-OMe II-09 6-Cl III-04 6-Br 表 2 目标化合物在5.0 μg/mL下的除草活性 (小杯法)
Table 2. Herbicidal activities of target compounds at 5.0 μg/mL (petri dish assay)
化合物
Compounds抑制率 Inhibition rate/%* 稗草
E. crusgalli马唐
D. sanguinalis马齿苋
P. oleracea野油菜
B. juncea根/茎
Root/Stem根/茎
Root/Stem根/茎
Root/Stem根/茎
Root/StemI-01 3.2/8.6 4.8/11.9 14.5/30.9 17.2/31.1 I-02 2.3/7.1 2.0/5.6 12.9/36.8 20.7/49.8 I-03 1.7/5.1 3.7/8.4 6.7/21.5 10.9/25.6 I-04 3.5/9.9 7.2/17.1 16.3/40.1 26.5/58.8 I-05 0.2/1.2 4.7/9.3 15.0/39.4 5.9/21.5 I-06 1.6/4.5 2.5/6.6 6.2/23.3 3.5/9.3 II-01 13.2/34.0 85.0/93.4 100/100 96.9/97.6 II-02 4.3/11.7 10.3/19.2 100/100 96.2/100 II-03 0.2/1.3 2.7/6.5 11.8/30.2 10.4/29.9 II-04 5.9/20.6 3.8/9.1 80.3/85.9 89.2/94.5 II-05 1.0/3.2 3.0/6.7 23.8/58.5 32.6/69.4 II-06 2.8/9.1 13.9/22.0 98.3/99.2 100/100 II-07 6.5/22.6 5.2/11.1 10.4/36.8 12.5/41.9 II-08 4.7/20.3 0.2/1.2 71.7/75.9 77.2/79.2 II-09 5.6/13.5 6.2/15.9 20.2/46.5 22.8/54.9 II-10 3.3/12.8 10.8/22.2 80.6/83.9 97.0/97.5 III-01 10.8/32.1 87.2/91.4 100/100 100/100 III-02 72.7/85.5 90.3/96.9 100/100 100/100 III-03 20.6/42.9 16.0/41.2 100/100 100/100 III-04 59.8/74.6 76.5/87.9 100/100 100/100 三氟羧草醚
acifluorfen52.5/64.7 47.7/65.8 100/100 100/100 注:*表中数据为 3 次重复平均值。Note: * The data in the table is the average of the three repeats. 表 3 部分化合物对四种供试杂草的EC50值
Table 3. EC50 value of selected compounds against four tested weeds
化合物
CompoundEC50 值 (95% 置信区间)
EC50 value (95% confidence interval)/(μg/mL)稗草 E. crusgalli 马唐 D. sanguinalis 马齿苋 P. oleracea 野油菜 B. juncea II-01 茎 Stem 7.48(5.67~9.88) 1.14(0.99~1.31) 0.14(0.11~0.18) 0.50(0.40~0.63) 根 Root 12.56(11.51~13.72) 1.67(1.45~1.92) 0.23(0.18~0.30) 0.54(0.42~0.71) III-01 茎 Stem 8.60(6.65~11.12) 1.46(1.28~1.66) 0.12(0.10~0.15) 0.38(0.29~0.50) 根 Root 13.13(12.03~14.34) 1.53(1.33~1.77) 0.20(0.16~0.24) 0.43(0.35~0.54) III-02 茎 Stem 0.93(0.74~1.17) 0.52(0.43~0.63) 0.07(0.06~0.09) 0.26(0.20~0.35) 根 Root 2.03(1.71~2.42) 1.49(1.30~1.70) 0.14(0.11~0.18) 0.32(0.25~0.41) III-03 茎 Stem 5.88(4.78~7.23) 6.38(4.85~8.40) 0.21(0.16~0.26) 0.61(0.49~0.75) 根 Root 10.72(9.68~11.87) 15.90(13.88~18.25) 0.21(0.17~0.27) 0.62(0.49~0.79) III-04 茎 Stem 1.97(1.59~2.43) 2.03(1.79~2.31) 0.10(0.08~0.12) 0.34(0.27~0.42) 根 Root 3.61(3.10~4.19) 3.77(3.41~4.17) 0.18(0.15~0.23) 0.42(0.32~0.54) 三氟羧草醚
acifluorfen茎 Stem 3.29(2.88~3.77) 3.92(3.45~4.44) 0.09(0.07~0.11) 0.31(0.24~0.39) 根 Root 4.33(3.67~5.11) 5.77(4.94~6.75) 0.17(0.14~0.20) 0.35(0.28~0.44) 表 4 部分化合物苗后处理的除草活性
Table 4. Post-emergence herbicidal activity of selected compounds
化合物
Compound剂量
Dose,a.i./
(g/hm2)防治效果 Control efficacy/% 稗草
E. crusgalli马唐
D. sanguinalis狗尾草
S. viridis马齿苋
P. oleracea反枝苋
A. retroflexus苘麻
A. theophrastiII-01 100 41.2 ± 2.1 f 87.4 ± 1.2 bc 58.1 ± 2.2 d 85.2 ± 2.0 b 75.2 ± 2.5 c 80.8 ± 2.4 d 50 23.3 ± 1.8 g 73.3 ± 1.9 d 41.3 ± 3.8 f 73.6 ± 3.2 c 66.3 ± 1.8 d 71.2 ± 2.3 e III-01 100 43.0 ± 2.1 f 82.7 ± 2.0 c 44.4 ± 3.4 f 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 91.2 ± 1.5 c 50 20.5 ± 1.3 g 72.1 ± 1.6 d 33.4 ± 2.2 g 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 79.5 ± 2.3 d III-02 100 88.7 ± 1.2 a 92.8 ± 2.5 a 87.5 ± 2.4 a 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 50 74.0 ± 3.1 b 89.6 ± 1.6 ab 73.2 ± 2.8 b 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a III-03 100 51.9 ± 1.7 e 52.1 ± 3.6 f 50.2 ± 2.3 e 100 ± 0.0 a 87.9 ± 1.4 b 91.1 ± 3.1 c 50 43.1 ± 2.4 f 45.5 ± 2.5 g 42.1 ± 1.4 f 100 ± 0.0 a 72.0 ± 2.1 c 81.2 ± 1.7 d III-04 100 76.1 ± 1.5 b 75.5 ± 2.7 d 65.1 ± 3.7 c 100 ± 0.0 a 96.9 ± 3.3 a 93.7 ± 2.7 bc 50 60.6 ± 2.3 d 62.6 ± 2.1 e 53.5 ± 1.9 de 100 ± 0.0 a 87.8 ± 3.0 b 83.0 ± 2.4 d 三氟羧草醚
acifluorfen100 64.9 ± 1.6 c 86.3 ± 2.5 bc 69.4 ± 1.1 bc 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 50 53.7 ± 1.2 e 70.8 ± 1.6 d 53.9 ± 2.0 de 100 ± 0.0 a 100 ± 0.0 a 96.6 ± 2.6 ab 注: 表中数据为 3 次重复平均值 ± 标准偏差。不同字母表示经Duncan’s新复极差测验, 在 P0.05 水平差异显著。 Note: Data in the table are mean ± SD, and repeated for three times. Different letters indicate that there are significant differences at the level of P0.05 after Duncan’s multiple range test. -
[1] ZHANG H X, WANG J B, JI Z M, et al. Discovery, SAR, and putative mode of action of N-benzyl-2-methoxybenzamides as potential bleaching herbicides[J]. Pest Manag Sci, 2021, 77(6): 2804-2811. doi: 10.1002/ps.6313 [2] 李源, 于乐祥, 王兴国. 氟吡酰草胺的合成及发展前景[J]. 云南化工, 2018, 45(1): 7-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2018.01.004LI Y, YU L X, WANG X G. Synthesis and development prospect of picolinafen[J]. Yunnan Chem Technol, 2018, 45(1): 7-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2018.01.004 [3] 杜铁钢. 三氟羧草醚氨基酸衍生物的合成及传导性研究[D]. 荆州: 长江大学, 2013.DU T G. Synthesis and translocation of the acifluorfen amino acid derivatives[D]. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2013. [4] 张季中. 三氟羧草醚对水田杂草药效及安全性的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2010(12): 62-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2767.2010.12.021ZHANG J Z. Effect of acifluorfen sodium on weeds in paddy and its safety to the rice[J]. Heilongjiang Agric Sci, 2010(12): 62-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2767.2010.12.021 [5] 胡尊纪, 刘军, 吴希宝, 等. 高效氟吡甲禾灵与三氟羧草醚复配的联合作用及对花生田杂草的防除效果[J]. 花生学报, 2021, 50(4): 30-35.HU Z J, LIU J, WU X B, et al. Interaction effect and control efficacy of haloxyfop-p-methyl and acifluorfen against weeds in peanut field[J]. J Peanut Sci, 2021, 50(4): 30-35. [6] HATTORI T, SHIMAZUMI Y, GOTO H, et al. Synthesis, resolution, and absolute stereochemistry of (–)-blestriarene C[J]. J Org Chem, 2003, 68(6): 2099-2108. doi: 10.1021/jo026747k [7] KAMPS J J A G, BELLE R, MECINOVIĆ J. Hydroxylamine as an oxygen nucleophile: substitution of sulfonamide by a hydroxyl group in benzothiazole-2-sulfonamides[J]. Org Biomol Chem, 2013, 11(7): 1103-1108. doi: 10.1039/C2OB26929E [8] SUN X L, JI Z M, WEI S P, et al. Design, synthesis, and herbicidal activity of N-benzyl-5-cyclopropyl-isoxazole- 4-carboxamides[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2020, 68(51): 15107-15114. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03582 [9] 农药室内生物测定试验准则 除草剂: NY/T 1155.3—2006 [S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.Pesticides guidelines for laboratory bioactivity tests for herbicide bioactivity: NY/T 1155.3—2006[S]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2006. [10] 王恒智, 赵孔平, 张晓林, 等. 土壤处理防治小麦田杂草节节麦药剂筛选[J]. 农药学学报, 2021, 23(3): 523-529.WANG H Z, ZHAO K P, ZHANG X L, et al. Screening of pre-emergence herbicides to control a noxious weed Aegilops tauschii in wheat fields[J]. Chin J Pestic Sci, 2021, 23(3): 523-529. [11] 宋敏, 路兴涛, 陈晓枫, 等. 8种茎叶处理除草剂对花生田杂草的防除效果及安全性[J]. 农药, 2018, 57(9): 687-689.SONG M, LU X T, CHEN X F, et al. Control effects and safety evaluation of eight foliar applied herbicides on weeds in peanut Fields[J]. Agrochemicals, 2018, 57(9): 687-689. [12] 韩德新, 刘宇龙, 芮静, 等. 不同除草剂对大豆田反枝苋的防除效果研究[J]. 东北农业科学, 2016, 41(5): 79-82.HAN D X, LIU Y L, RUI J, et al. The control effect of several soybean herbicide to Amaranthus retroflexus[J]. J Northeast Agric Sci, 2016, 41(5): 79-82. -