甘薯长喙壳菌对咯菌腈的敏感基线及咯菌腈对甘薯黑斑病的防治效果

张德胜; 乔奇; 白瑞英; 田雨婷; 王爽; 王永江; 赵付枚; 张振臣

doi:10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2022.0094

甘薯长喙壳菌对咯菌腈的敏感基线及咯菌腈对甘薯黑斑病的防治效果

doi: 10.16801/j.issn.1008-7303.2022.0094

1.
河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所，河南省农作物病虫害防治重点实验室，农业农村部华北南部作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室，郑州 450002

基金项目: 国家现代农业产业技术体系资助 (CARS-10-B13)；河南省科技攻关 (212102110458)；河南省农业科学院自主创新基金 (2021ZC38).

详细信息

作者简介:
张德胜，zhangdesheng404@163.com

通讯作者:
张振臣，zhangzhenchen@126.com

中图分类号: S482.2；S481.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 233
- HTML全文浏览量: 85
- PDF下载量: 53
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-24
- 录用日期: 2022-04-13
- 网络出版日期: 2022-08-31
- 刊出日期: 2022-12-02

Sensitivity baseline of Ceratocystis fimbriata to fludioxonil and control efficacy of fludioxonil against black rot of sweet potato

1.
Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Henan Key Laboratory of Crop Pest Control/IPM Key Laboratory in Southern Part of North China for Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhengzhou 450002, China

Funds: China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-10-B13); Science and Technology Projects of Henan Province (212102110458); Independent Innovation Foundation of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2021ZC38)

摘要

摘要: 为探索甘薯长喙壳菌Ceratocystis fimbriata 对咯菌腈的敏感性，明确咯菌腈在苗期和储藏期对甘薯黑斑病的防治效果，分别从中国河南、四川、河北、山东采集并分离得到64株甘薯长喙壳菌；采用凹玻片法观察了咯菌腈对病原菌分生孢子萌发和芽管伸长的影响；采用孢子萌发法和菌丝生长速率法测定了64个菌株对咯菌腈的敏感性，并对50% 咯菌腈可湿性粉剂 (WP) 防治苗期和储藏期甘薯黑斑病的效果进行了评价。结果表明：随咯菌腈处理浓度增加，甘薯长喙壳菌分生孢子的萌发率逐渐下降，芽管扭曲程度逐渐加大。咯菌腈还可造成菌株芽管过早出现分支。咯菌腈对供试菌株分生孢子萌发的EC₅₀值在0.20~0.99 μg/mL，平均值为0.52 μg/mL；对菌丝生长的EC₅₀值在0.17~0.31 μg/mL，平均值为0.24 μg/mL，不同敏感性菌株所占频率呈正态分布，可作为甘薯长喙壳菌对咯菌腈的敏感基线。50% 咯菌腈WP 在有效成分500 mg/L 下浸苗处理，对薯苗黑斑病的防治效果可达90.24%，显著高于500 g/L甲基硫菌灵悬浮剂 (SC) 同浓度下的处理。采用浸薯块法防治储藏期黑斑病，50% 咯菌腈WP 500 mg/L连续两年的防治效果分别达到84.41%和82.30%，也显著高于同浓度的甲基硫菌灵。药剂处理后60和90 d，甘薯块中咯菌腈的残留量低于其最大残留限量 (MRL) 标准。本研究表明，咯菌腈具有防治甘薯生长期和储藏期黑斑病的潜力。
- 甘薯长喙壳菌 /
- 咯菌腈 /
- 敏感基线 /
- 甘薯黑斑病 /
- 防治效果
Abstract: The objective of this study is to investigate the sensitivity of Ceratocystis fimbriata to fludioxonil, and evaluate the control efficacy of fludioxonil against the black rot of sweet potatoes during the seedling and storage stages. A total of 64 isolates were collected from sweet potatoes in Henan, Sichuan, Hebei, and Shandong Provinces. With the concave slide tests, the effect of fludioxonil on spore germination and germ tube elongation was observed. The sensitivity of 64 isolates was determined by spore germination and mycelial growth rate methods respectively. Meanwhile, the control efficacies of fludioxonil 50% WP against the black rot of sweet potatoes in the seedling and storage stages were evaluated. The results showed that the conidia germination rate of C. fimbriata decreased gradually and the tortuosity of the germ tube increased gradually with the increase of fludioxonil concentrations. Fludioxonil could also cause premature branching of the germ tube. EC₅₀ values of fludioxonil against spore germination ranged from 0.20 μg/mL to 0.99 μg/mL, with a mean of 0.52 μg/mL. EC₅₀ values of fludioxonil against mycelial growth ranged from 0.17 μg/mL to 0.31 μg/mL, with a mean of 0.24 μg/mL. As the sensitivity frequency showed normal distribution, the mean EC₅₀ values could be regarded as the baseline sensitivity of C. fimbriata to fludioxonil. The control efficacy of fludioxonil 50% WP on seedlings of sweet potato dipped in the suspension of 500 mg a.i./L fludioxonil was 90.24%, which was significantly higher than that of thiophanate-methyl 500 g/L SC at the same concentration during the seedling stage. The control efficacies of fludioxonil dipped in the suspension of fludioxonil at 500 mg a.i./L for two consecutive years were 84.41% and 82.30%, respectively, which were also significantly higher than that of thiophanate-methyl dripped in the suspension of thiophanate-methyl with the same concentration during storage process. The residues of fludioxonil were lower than the maximum residue limit (MRL) at 60 d and 90 d after application. This study suggested fludioxonil has great potential to control the black rot of sweet potatoes during both growth and storage stages.
- Ceratocystis fimbriata /
- fludioxonil /
- sensitivity baseline /
- black rot of sweet potato /
- control efficacy

HTML全文

图 1 咯菌腈对甘薯长喙壳菌分生孢子萌发的影响

A：清水对照 (9 h)；B：咯菌腈0.5 μg/mL (9 h)；C：咯菌腈1 μg/mL (9 h)；D：咯菌腈2 μg/mL (20 h)。

Figure 1. Effects of fludioxonil on conidial germination of C. fimbriata

A: CK (9 h)；B: fludioxonil 0.5 μg/mL (9 h)；C: fludioxonil 1 μg/mL (9 h)；D: fludioxonil 2 μg/mL (20 h).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 咯菌腈对甘薯长喙壳菌菌丝生长的影响

A：清水对照 (9 h)；B：咯菌腈0.3 μg/mL (9 h)；C：咯菌腈0.5 μg/mL (9 h)；D：咯菌腈0.5 μg/mL (9 h)。

Figure 2. Effects of fludioxonil on mycelium growth of C. fimbriata

A: CK (9 h)；B: fludioxonil 0.3 μg/mL (9 h)；C: fludioxonil 0.5 μg/mL (9 h)；D: fludioxonil 0.5 μg/mL (9 h).

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 甘薯长喙壳菌孢子萌发 (A) 和菌丝生长 (B) 对咯菌腈的敏感性频率分布

Figure 3. Frequency distribution of sensitivity on conidial germination (A) and mycelium growth (B) of C. fimbriata to fludioxonil

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 咯菌腈对苗期黑斑病的防治效果

Table 1. The control efficacy of fludioxonil to black rot of sweet potato seedlings

药剂 Fungicide	有效成分剂量 Dosage, a.i./(mg/L)	病株率 Disease incidence/%	防治效果 Control efficacy/%	50 株薯苗总鲜重 Total fresh weight of 50 seedlings/kg
50% 咯菌腈 WP fludioxonil 50% WP	250	4.67	82.93 ± 5.19 ab	2.05 ± 0.07 b
50% 咯菌腈 WP fludioxonil 50% WP	500	2.67	90.24 ± 2.76 a	2.08 ± 0.07 b
500 g/L 甲基硫菌灵 thiophanate-methyl 500 g/L SC	500	6.00	78.05 ± 3.94 b	2.27 ± 0.09 a
CK	―	27.33	―	1.96 ± 0.05 b
注：同列数据后不同小写字母分别表示经新复极差法比较在0.05水平差异显著。Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences at 0.05 level by the new multiple range test.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 咯菌腈对储藏期黑斑病的防治效果

Table 2. The control efficacy of fludioxonil to black rot of sweet potato in storage

药剂 Fungicide	有效成分剂量 Dosage, a.i./(mg/L)	防治效果 Control efficacy /%
药剂 Fungicide	有效成分剂量 Dosage, a.i./(mg/L)	2019	2020
50% 咯菌腈 WP fludioxonil 50% WP	250	63.43 ± 5.95 b	68.03 ± 2.83 b
50% 咯菌腈 WP fludioxonil 50% WP	500	84.41 ± 7.25 a	82.30 ± 1.35 a
500 g/L 甲基硫菌灵 SC thiophanate-methyl 500g/L SC	500	54.71 ± 9.71 b	56.31 ± 3.76 c
注：同列数据后不同小写字母分别表示经新复极差法比较在0.05水平差异显著。Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences at 0.05 level by the new multiple range test.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 施用50% 咯菌腈WP后甘薯块中的残留量及相关标准

Table 3. Residual quantity of fludioxonil 50% WP in root tuber of sweet potato and standard of MRL and ADI

有效成分剂量 Dosage, a.i./(mg/L)	残留量 Residue/(mg/kg)		最大残留限量 MRL/(mg/kg)^[22]	每日允许摄入量 ADI/( mg/kg)^[22]
有效成分剂量 Dosage, a.i./(mg/L)	60 d 残留 Residue at 60 d in storage/(mg/kg)	90 d 残留 Residue at 90 d in storage/(mg/kg)	最大残留限量 MRL/(mg/kg)^[22]	每日允许摄入量 ADI/( mg/kg)^[22]
250	1.11	0.54	10	0.4
500	2.02	1.37
750	2.39	1.68

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(31)

[1]	郭予元, 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所, 中国植物保护学会. 中国农作物病虫害[M]. 3 版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2015: 848-852. GUO Y Y, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China Society of Plant Protection. Crop diseases and insect pests in China [M]. 3^rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2015: 848-852.
[2]	徐梦瑶, 赵祥颖, 张立鹤, 等. 甘薯的营养价值及保健作用[J]. 中国果菜, 2017, 37(5): 17-21. XU M Y, ZHAO X Y, ZHANG L H, et al. The nutritional value and health care function of sweet potato[J]. China Fruit Veg, 2017, 37(5): 17-21.
[3]	防治甘薯黑斑病产品目录. 中国农药信息网[DB/OL]. [2021-09-23]. http://www.chinapesticide.gov.cn/hysj/index.jhtml. Product catalogue of control black rot of sweet potato. China pesticide information network[DB/OL]. [2021-09-23]. http://www.chinapesticide.gov.cn/hysj/index.jhtml.
[4]	张德胜, 张永超, 乔奇, 等. 10 种杀菌剂对甘薯黑斑病的毒力及联合毒力[J]. 农药, 2012, 51(6): 452-454. ZHANG D S, ZHANG Y C, QIAO Q, et al. Toxicity and co-toxicity of ten fungicides to Ceratocystis fimbriata[J]. Agrochemicals, 2012, 51(6): 452-454.
[5]	周明国, 叶钟音, 刘经芬. 南京市郊灰霉菌对苯并咪唑类杀菌剂田间抗性的检测[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 1987, 10(2): 53-58. ZHOU M G, YE Z Y, LIU J F. Detection of resistance of grey mold (Botrytis cinerea) to benzimidazoles in the field[J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 1987, 10(2): 53-58.
[6]	胡美姣, 师超, 安勇, 等. 杧果蒂腐病菌对多菌灵的抗药性测定及其杀菌剂筛选[J]. 果树学报, 2009, 26(5): 671-677. HU M J, SHI C, AN Y, et al. Resistance of Botryodiplodia theobromae to carbendazim and the fungicides screening using stem end rot of mango fruit as a control[J]. J Fruit Sci, 2009, 26(5): 671-677.
[7]	张志德, 朱俊光. 粉锈宁防治甘薯黑斑病初步研究[J]. 植物保护学报, 1991, 18(4): 305-310. ZHANG Z D, ZHU J G. Preliminary study on the control of Ceratocystis fimbriata of sweet potato by triadimefon[J]. J Plant Prot, 1991, 18(4): 305-310.
[8]	张德胜, 乔奇, 田雨婷, 等. 5 种杀菌剂对储藏期甘薯黑斑病的防效及对薯块的安全性评价[J]. 植物保护, 2015, 41(6): 221-224. ZHANG D S, QIAO Q, TIAN Y T, et al. Control efficacy of five fungicides to black rot of sweet potato in storage and safety assessment to storage roots[J]. Plant Prot, 2015, 41(6): 221-224.
[9]	SCRUGGS A C, BASAIAH T, ADAMS M L, et al. Genetic diversity, fungicide sensitivity, and host resistance to Ceratocystis fimbriata infecting sweetpotato in north Carolina[J]. Plant Dis, 2017, 101(6): 994-1001. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-16-1583-RE
[10]	MOHSIN S M, HASANUZZAMAN M, PARVIN K, et al. Effect of tebuconazole and trifloxystrobin on Ceratocystis fimbriata to control black rot of sweet potato: processes of reactive oxygen species generation and antioxidant defense responses[J]. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2021, 37(9): 148. doi: 10.1007/s11274-021-03111-5
[11]	张德胜, 白瑞英, 乔奇, 等. 甲基硫菌灵和百菌清浸苗防治甘薯黑斑病的影响因素分析[J]. 农药学学报, 2021, 23(2): 331-340. ZHANG D S, BAI R Y, QIAO Q, et al. Influencing factors of dipping seedling with thiophanate-methyl and chlorothalonil against the black rot of sweet potato[J]. Chin J Pestic Sci, 2021, 23(2): 331-340.
[12]	COLLINS H, ADAMS M L, QUESADA-OCAMPO L M. Evaluation of fungicides for control of black rot in sweetpotato[J]. Plant Dis Manage Report, 2016, 11: V118.
[13]	刘长令, 杨吉春. 现代农药手册[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2018: 19-22, 534-536. LIU C L, YANG J C. Handbook of modern pesticide[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2018: 19-22, 534-536.
[14]	AUTHORITY E F S. Modification of the existing MRLs for fludioxonil in sweet potatoes, yams and grapes[J]. EFSA J, 2010, 8(11): 1912. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1912
[15]	刘晓芸, 杨兰, 王会君, 等. 甘薯黑痣病防治药剂的筛选[J]. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(11): 93-96. LIU X Y, YANG L, WANG H J, et al. Screening for germicides to effectively control monilochactes infuscans on sweet potato[J]. J Henan Agric Sci, 2014, 43(11): 93-96.
[16]	彭勇, 王雪姣, 马玉荣, 等. 甘薯贮藏期间抑芽防腐技术研究[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(10): 80-86. PENG Y, WANG X J, MA Y R, et al. Decay and sprout control technology of sweet potato during storage[J]. J Agric, 2018, 8(10): 80-86.
[17]	王容燕, 高波, 李秀花, 等. 咯菌腈及其组合物在防治甘薯储藏期病害上的应用: CN105557993B[P]. 2019-12-17. WANG R Y, GAO B, LI X H, et al. Application of fludioxonil and compound thereof in preventing and treating diseases of sweet potato during storage: CN105557993B [P]. 2019-12-17.
[18]	冯启涣, 陆漱韵, 王莉莉, 等. 甘薯黑斑病人工接种方法研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 1998, 3(1): 50-56. FENG Q H, LU S Y, WANG L L, et al. Studies on the artificial inoculation method of black rot(Ceratocystis fimbriata Ellis et Halated) of sweet potato[J]. J China Agric Univ, 1998, 3(1): 50-56.
[19]	农药室内生物测定试验准则第 1 部分: 抑制病原真菌孢子萌发试验凹玻片法: NY/T 1156.1—2006[S]. 2006. Pesticides guidelines for laboratory bioactivity tests, part 1: determining fungicide inhibition of pathogen spore germination on concave slides: NY/T 1156.1—2006[S]. 2006.
[20]	张德胜, 张振臣, 王爽, 等. 一种促进甘薯黑斑病菌分生孢子稳定萌发并获得最佳观察效果的方法: CN 106498026A[P]. 2017-03-15. ZHANG D S, ZHANG Z C, WANG S, et al. A method for promoting stable conidial germination of Ceratocystis fimbriata and obtaining optimum observation effect: CN 106498026A [P]. 2017-03-15.
[21]	农药室内生物测定试验准则第 2 部分: 抑制病原真菌菌丝生长试验平皿法: NY/T 1156.2—2006[S]. 2006. Pesticides guidelines for laboratory bioactivity tests, part 2: petri plate test for determining fungicide inhibition of mycelial growth: NY/T 1156.2—2006[S]. 2006.
[22]	食品安全国家标准食品中农药最大残留限量: GB 2763—2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021: 148. National food safety standard, maximum residue limits for pesticides in food: GB 2763—2021[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2021: 148.
[23]	唐启义, 冯明光. 实用统计分析及其 DPS 数据处理系统[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002. TANG Q Y, FENG M G. DPS data processing system for practical statistics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2002.
[24]	徐建强, 平忠良, 刘莹, 等. 咯菌腈对四种牡丹叶片病原真菌的抑制活性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(20): 4036-4045. XU J Q, PING Z L, LIU Y, et al. Inhibitory activity of fludioxonil to four pathogenic fungi of peony leaves[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2017, 50(20): 4036-4045.
[25]	禾丽菲, 李晓旭, 朱佳美, 等. 不同杀菌剂对黄瓜靶斑病菌的毒力作用特性比较[J]. 农药学学报, 2018, 20(1): 25-32. HE L F, LI X X, ZHU J M, et al. Comparison of toxicity properties of different types of fungicides against Corynespora cassiicola on cucumber[J]. Chin J Pestic Sci, 2018, 20(1): 25-32.
[26]	DUAN Y B, GE C Y, LIU S M, et al. Effect of phenylpyrrole fungicide fludioxonil on morphological and physiological characteristics of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum[J]. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2013, 106(1-2): 61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2013.04.004
[27]	邵莒南, 徐大同, 李慧. 氟啶胺等杀菌剂对不同发育阶段小麦赤霉病菌的毒力及其作用方式[J]. 植物保护学报, 2016, 43(2): 314-320. SHAO J N, XU D T, LI H. Toxicity and modes of action of fluazinam and other fungicides against wheat Fusarium graminearum at different life stages[J]. J Plant Prot, 2016, 43(2): 314-320.
[28]	符雨诗, 王明爽, 阮若昕, 等. 柑橘绿霉病菌对咯菌腈的敏感基线的建立[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(1): 68-74. FU Y S, WANG M S, RUAN R X, et al. Baseline sensitivity to fludioxonil of Penicillum digitatum population from citrus in China[J]. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2015, 27(1): 68-74.
[29]	REN W C, SHAO W Y, HAN X, et al. Molecular and biochemical characterization of laboratory and field mutants of Botrytis cinerea resistant to fludioxonil[J]. Plant Dis, 2016, 100(7): 1414-1423. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-15-1290-RE
[30]	SANG C W, REN W C, WANG J J, et al. Detection and fitness comparison of target-based highly fludioxonil-resistant isolates of Botrytis cinerea from strawberry and cucumber in China[J]. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2018, 147: 110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.01.012
[31]	PETERS R D, PLATT H W, DRAKE K A, et al. First report of fludioxonil-resistant isolates of Fusarium spp. causing potato seed-piece decay[J]. Plant Dis, 2008, 92(1): 172.